Updates

What's happening with the California handgun roster — new laws, legal challenges, SCOTUS action, and key dates for gun owners.

Key dates ahead

Feb 20, 2026 Duncan v. Bonta at SCOTUS — Next conference date. The cert petition has been relisted six times without action — a pattern that often precedes a grant. A SCOTUS grant would impact the roster via the held Boland case.
Apr 1, 2026 AB 1078 — New 3-firearm-per-30-days purchase limit replaces the old 1-handgun-per-30-days rule. Applies to handguns and semiautomatic centerfire rifles.
Jul 1, 2026 AB 1127 "Glock Ban" — Dealers prohibited from selling "machinegun-convertible pistols." Affects most Glock models and striker-fired clones. Private transfers and current ownership not affected.
Jan 1, 2027 AB 1127 resubmission deadline — Manufacturers can modify affected roster pistols for compliance and resubmit for lab testing without meeting microstamping or other modern requirements.
Jan 1, 2028 SB 452 microstamping mandate — If DOJ viability finding holds, all new semiautomatic pistols must include microstamping to be sold by licensed dealers.
2026 This Year
Jan 2026
Legal
Duncan v. Bonta — repeatedly conferenced at SCOTUS

The Supreme Court has conferenced Duncan v. Bonta (Case No. 25-198) multiple times — Nov 21, Dec 5, Dec 12, Jan 9, Jan 16, and Jan 23 — without granting or denying cert. Each relisting increases the likelihood of a grant. The next conference is scheduled for February 20, 2026. If SCOTUS takes the case, it could set national precedent on magazine bans and Second Amendment methodology — with downstream implications for the handgun roster via the held Boland case.

Jan 7, 2026
Roster Status
Roster enters 2026 largely unchanged

The roster carried approximately 800 handgun models into the new year. Additions in 2025 were minimal and removals continued under the 3-for-1 rule, which requires three non-compliant models to be removed for every new semiautomatic pistol added. Manufacturer participation remains cautious.

Jan 1, 2026
New Law
AB 1263 — Online gun parts ban takes effect

Firearm components, accessories, tools, and even 3D printer files now require ID verification, signed delivery, and strict address matching for online purchases. Several major retailers have stopped shipping to California entirely. Replacement barrels and upper receivers now effectively require FFL transactions.

Jan 1, 2026
New Law
AB 1127 — First phase begins

The "Glock Ban" bill's first restrictions take effect. Dealers can no longer order new inventory of affected models. The full sales prohibition hits July 1, 2026. Glock discontinued most Gen 3 production by November 2025, triggering a statewide buying frenzy and sharp price spikes on remaining inventory.

Jan 1, 2026
Regulatory
DOJ begins accepting microstamping producer applications

Following the July 2025 viability determination, the DOJ is now accepting license applications from entities seeking to produce microstamping components. This is part of the SB 452 timeline — the standalone microstamping mandate effective January 1, 2028.

2025 Last Year
Nov 30, 2025
Industry
Glock halts production of Gen 3 models

Glock discontinued nearly all existing pistol models — including roster-approved Gen 3 variants — to transition to their new V Series lineup. The V Series is not roster-approved and cannot be sold in California. Distributors reported critically low stock levels, and prices on remaining Gen 3 Glocks spiked statewide.

Oct 10, 2025
Signed Into Law
Governor Newsom signs AB 1127 — the "Glock Ban"

AB 1127 bans the sale of "machinegun-convertible pistols" — semiautomatic handguns with cruciform trigger bars (like Glocks) that can be modified with illegal switches. Effective July 1, 2026. Does not affect current ownership or private party transfers. Manufacturers can redesign and resubmit compliant models by January 1, 2027. Track the bill →

Sep 2025
Legal
Boland v. Bonta — vacated and held with Duncan

The Ninth Circuit vacated the Boland roster challenge and held it pending alongside Duncan v. Bonta and Miller v. Bonta (assault weapons ban). The same 11-judge en banc panel will decide all three cases. Boland had previously secured a preliminary injunction striking down CLI and MDM requirements — that injunction remains stayed pending appeal. The roster's future likely depends on SCOTUS taking up Duncan.

Sep 1, 2025
Regulatory
DOJ publishes microstamping performance standards

Following its July viability finding, the DOJ published written guidance on performance standards for microstamping component producers — the next step in the SB 452 implementation timeline.

Jul 24, 2025
Legal
Ninth Circuit strikes down ammo background checks

In Rhode v. Bonta, a three-judge Ninth Circuit panel found California's ammunition background check regime unconstitutional and affirmed the district court's permanent injunction. While not directly roster-related, this signals the court's willingness to apply Bruen to California gun laws.

Jul 18, 2025
Regulatory
DOJ declares microstamping "technologically viable"

The California DOJ released its report concluding that microstamping technology is viable for producing identifiable marks on spent cartridge casings. This triggers the SB 452 implementation timeline leading to a January 1, 2028 mandate for all new semiautomatic pistol sales.

Mar 2025
Legal
Duncan v. Bonta — magazine ban upheld en banc (7–4)

The Ninth Circuit's en banc panel upheld California's 10-round magazine capacity limit, holding that magazines are "accessories" rather than "arms" under the Second Amendment. Judges Bumatay, Ikuta, Nelson, and VanDyke dissented. CRPA filed a cert petition with the Supreme Court on August 17, 2025 (Case No. 25-198), supported by amicus briefs from 27 state attorneys general.

2025
Roster
11% excise tax fully realized — first full year

AB 28's 11% excise tax on all firearm and ammunition sales (on top of existing sales tax) completed its first full calendar year. Revenue funds violence intervention programs. The added cost further impacts California buyers already paying premium prices for roster-compliant handguns.

2025
Legal
James v. Bonta filed — challenging AB 1127

The Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC), Second Amendment Foundation (SAF), and NRA filed James v. Bonta, directly challenging AB 1127's constitutionality. The case argues the law targets common, lawful firearms based on a criminal misuse that is already illegal under state and federal law.

2025
Legal
Renna v. Bonta — still pending at Ninth Circuit

The FPC/SAF challenge to the entire Unsafe Handgun Act remains pending. The district court had enjoined CLI, MDM requirements and the 3-for-1 rule. The injunction is stayed pending appeal. Many legal observers consider this case (alongside Boland) as the most direct path to dismantling the roster.

Earlier 2023–2024 Key Events
Late 2023
Roster Additions
Springfield Hellcat, Sig P365, S&W M&P 2.0 added

Several long-awaited models were added to the roster, including the Springfield Hellcat, Hellcat Pro, Sig Sauer P365, Smith & Wesson M&P 2.0 Compact and Full Size, and Kimber K6XS. These represented some of the first significant additions in years.

Sep 26, 2023
Signed Into Law
SB 452 — Microstamping becomes standalone requirement

Governor Newsom signed SB 452, removing microstamping from the Unsafe Handgun Act definition and making it a standalone sales restriction. Implementation is tied to a DOJ viability study. If viable, the mandate takes effect January 1, 2028 — requiring all new semiautomatic pistols sold to include microstamping.

Mar–Apr 2023
Legal Milestone
Boland & Renna — District courts grant injunctions

Judge Carney (Boland v. Bonta, March 20) and Judge Sabraw (Renna v. Bonta, March 31) both granted preliminary injunctions against the roster's CLI, MDM, and microstamping requirements. Renna also enjoined the 3-for-1 rule. Both injunctions were stayed on appeal to the Ninth Circuit, keeping requirements in place during litigation.

Jul 1, 2022
Law Change
AB 2847 — Microstamping reduced to one imprint

Previously, handguns needed two microstamping imprint locations. AB 2847 reduced this to one — but simultaneously codified the 3-for-1 rule, requiring three non-compliant handguns to be removed from the roster for every new microstamping-equipped model added.

This page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Dates, case statuses, and legislative details are based on publicly available information and may change. Always verify with the CA DOJ Bureau of Firearms or a qualified attorney before making purchase decisions.